Team Roping in Texas – January

 

Last week I returned from spending some time in Baltimore, studying and just trying to stay warm. This past weekend I was in shirt sleeves and shooting images of a local team roping with temperatures hovering around 70 degrees. This is a big reason why we moved to Texas. Warm winter weather, great people and awesome horses. We are still trying to forget about the Superbowl Blizzard of 2011, but I hope the rest of the country will not…

Captured with: nikon d700, 400mm @ f/2.8, ISO 2500-3000, 1/640, natural indoor arena lighting.

Jeff EdwardsNo Gravatar - January 27, 2012 - 1:52 am

Dave – I have found shooting rodeo sports a bit challenging and what lenses to use is really arena and event dependent. For example, this past weekend I set up at the far end of a 300 foot indoor arena – thus used the 400mm lens. Last night here in Stephenville there was a bull riding event I shot. The arena was 1/3 the size and I used my 85mm and 70-200mm exclusively. You also need to consider lighting – I hate flash for sport events. Therefore, fast glass/high iso is mandatory, the 85mm, f/1.4 is superb…you pay a price in the depth of field. ISOs were running 2500-3000. My keeper rate was lower, but the images look very good – I will post some later this week. Thanks for stopping by and shoot me an email if any further questions!

Dave WilsonNo Gravatar - January 25, 2012 - 6:20 pm

Great shots as usual! I’ll likely be shooting the Austin Rodeo again this March and I had been planning to rent a 300mm f/2.8 for the event. Looking at these, though, I may move up to the 400mm instead.

Fuji X100 does Washington D.C.

 

The learning curve is steep…but short with the X100. The images above are from my second outing with the Fuji and hopefully, show signs of improvement. I have learned to anticipate the shutter lag and plan a little better for images. For example, after having the shooting mode get “locked” I waded through the menu system and then ultimately reset the camera, to free up the manual settings. Upon review later in the evening on the train back to Baltimore – I discovered that if the camera is in “panorama mode” it locks many other manual settings. Ahhh… the joys of a new camera system.

All images were shot in jpeg, not RAW and run through Lightroom 3.0 (not the new 4.0 beta). I did a few adjustments and converted several images to b&w. The ISO ranged from 200-3200 and the shutter speeds were from 1/30 up. All images were hand-held, no tripod or other supports were used. I utilized in-camera processing primarily for all the jpegs including noise reduction. Bottom line – damn good camera, but be ready for some humble pie…

JustinNo Gravatar - January 17, 2012 - 11:23 pm

Nice Doc, thanks for sharing your experiences. If I can come up with a need….which I’m sure won’t be hard, I might be line for one of these myself. I still have my eye on the lens swapper though…we’ll see?

adminNo Gravatar - January 14, 2012 - 2:11 pm

Dave – I concur…more people seem to be attracted to the improved mirror-less large sensor cameras these days. I think the X100 makes a good case for a medium cost, high image quality addition to the market for now. The new Fuji X-pro 1 looks even more exciting but starts with one lens at twice the cost – but may just be the Lecia killer most of us have been looking for…time will tell. Regardless, the X100 is a great place to start and beats carrying a full size DSLR. Unless of course it’s a D4, ;) . Thanks for stopping by!

Dave WilsonNo Gravatar - January 13, 2012 - 1:48 pm

What a great collection of images! The X100 is getting a lot of traction these days and has already converted a sizeable percentage of my DSLR-totting buddies. Maybe it’s time I looked into a replacement for my trusty Canon G9 and set the D700 aside for a bit?

Baltimore…and the Fuji x100

On Monday I flew back to Baltimore to spend two weeks working at the School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins, much like last year. Just a bit warmer this time, no blizzards shutting down the city yet. Rather than lug my usual companion, the Nikon D700 and multiple lenses, I gladly toted my new quirky Fuji x100, who some have claimed (Zack Arias), that if they only had one camera in the world to use – it would be the x100. I am not sure that I completely agree, but I’m quickly becoming a believer. The images posted are all SOOC (straight out of camera) except for a few minor adjustments in Lightroom to make up for my compositional challenges and the one image converted to b&w. Additionally, these were shot as jpegs – not RAW quality. I wanted to see how the Fuji’s in-camera processing fared, which has several different film simulation settings that I will leave for another discussion.
The x100 is unique on several levels. It has a full size digital censor typically found on pro cameras, a prime (non-zoom) non-detachable f/2.0 lens which is sharp and wicked fast – which means you don’t typically need a flash to shoot in most conditions. Lastly, it has a very high ISO range. It can easily shoot to 3200 ISO with minimal noise noted in the images. These are all qualities found on the Nikon D700 and D3 pro series. That’s the good news.

However, this camera is not for the faint of heart. I certainly wouldn’t recommend it to anyone who doesn’t regularly shoot with a dslr. It is difficult to navigate the menu system and coordinate the multiple buttons, command dials and impossible manual focus ring, all on a camera body half the size of a full-frame. It is certainly manageable. But this isn’t a camera you pull up on a moving subject and rip off 10 fps of spot-on focused images with near perfect exposure in aperature priority mode. Each time you push the shutter release you have to be thinking about the shutter lag and slightly off center compositional issues of a range-finder type camera. I tried this tonight on a skate-boarding street gang (see below) and got off two images panning as they blew by. But one image was exceptional – given the lighting and situation. Perhaps almost as good as a camera 3-10x more expensive… I just didn’t get the 10 images to edit through that I typically would have.

At this time, I am shooting it in manual mode. That way I know exactly what it is or isn’t doing and can make the appropriate adjustments. The auto ISO is good during the daytime, but will crank up the ISO too high for some evening images such as xmas lights. Another good examples is shooting long exposures, like the moving cars below. It can only be done in manual – like a dslr. But that’s as it should be. These are not the type of shots one is going to get from your regular p&s camera.
The big advantage for the x100 is of course the image quality, which is very very good. In addition, it is small, unobtrusive and dead quiet. No shutter flap that is fairly noticeable, at least on the full-frame Nikons. However, it also forces you to go back and be more creative, take time and think about exactly what/how/why you are trying to capture perceptually. In other words, it makes you work harder for good quality images and I think that it will make everyone who uses it successfully, a better photographer in the long run. But I suspect a few words of discouragement (#@*!) along the way will be heard from the lips of even the best photogs.

For example, tonight I ventured out into the surrounding community to explore a bit. I spent a fair amount of time around the Baltimore Basilica, the first cathedral in the US. After about 30 minutes of fiddling with settings/menus/compositional challenges and being questioned about exactly what I was trying to do by several homeless folks and then making a small donation, I came up with some good images. Granted this was my first time out shooting with the X100, short of around the house. Tomorrow, I get the day off and will explore Washington, D.C. and see photographically what turns up. Any thing is possible…besides, I can only improve at this point, which is a good thing!

 

 

adminNo Gravatar - January 12, 2012 - 7:00 am

Efe – I had many of the same questions…is it worth it? Compared to a Lecia, absolutely. And let me be clear, it shoots solid images to an ISO of 3200, much like the D700 or D3 – nothing in the point & shoot realm will touch this short of the Lecia which is 8x more expensive (except the new Fuji just reported at CES). In addition, think of the prime lens not as limiting, but just forcing you to define better what you can or cannot shoot. It makes you “work” for the images and thus, a better photographer I would argue. See my next post for a bit of an improvement…I hope! All the best, my friend in Istanbul – jeff

Efecan AltuncuNo Gravatar - January 11, 2012 - 2:25 pm

I’ve been waiting for a review of that camera. Not because I think about buying it. I just wonder the feel of fixed 35mm. It sounds very very limited to me. I mean, I cannot pay such an amount of money for just a 35mm. Thanks for the in depth review, I know that you didn’t mentioned deep technical information, which is not really needed. Hearing that this camera can create usable images at ISO 1600, it has a “good” in camera jpeg processing and that it is extremely quiet…from a person that I trust as much as my own self :) ) is much more valuable than any technical detail, for me!

Still, fixed 35mm is too limited for me! Maybe I cannot get the point of the camera. It is made for street photography, indeed it is a very very professional and specialised camera?

Thanks for the review, I really enjoyed it.

Efe